EDITORIAL CORRESPONDENCE
Contact the Reference Desk
Notes on sources, wording, and evidence boundaries help keep the four files accurate.
Useful correspondence
The editorial desk welcomes precise notes about the research record. Helpful messages identify the page, quote the passage at issue, and name the source that supports a correction. Newly published peer-reviewed work, corrected citation metadata, and clearer descriptions of a study model are all within scope.
Editorial mailbox: editors@corepeptideslab.com
Every proposed change is checked against the relevant source before the digest is revised. A submitted citation does not guarantee inclusion; relevance, study design, compound identity, and fit with the four-file reference set all matter. The mailbox is monitored for editorial correspondence, and replies may not be immediate.
What the desk cannot answer
Core Peptides Lab does not provide individual medical guidance, human dosing, product sourcing, supplier assessment, or help interpreting personal symptoms. It cannot determine whether a compound is appropriate for a person, translate an experimental amount into a personal protocol, or evaluate an unverified product. Those requests fall outside an independent literature digest.
The clearest route for an editorial correction is a source-specific note. General product pitches, placement requests, and requests to endorse a clinic or supplier are not part of the desk's work. Questions already addressed in the compound files may be answered by the FAQ, the comparison, or the full reference register.
Messages about a study are most useful when they distinguish factual correction from a difference in interpretation. The desk can check authorship, methods, measured outcomes, and wording against the published record. It cannot adjudicate personal experiences or verify the contents of material obtained outside a controlled study. Privacy-sensitive health details are unnecessary for an editorial note and should be kept out of correspondence.